On behalf of recreational bicyclists, families, and commuting cyclists please sign our petition. If you don’t there will be no Peters Canyon Class 1 trail through Peters Canyon! And how ridiculous would that be?
Local opponents want to keep this public Regional Park for their own use. Only you can speak for the families, bicycle commuters, and the disabled– fellow taxpayers all –who cannot today access our Park.
Thursday evening, September 10 – Please attend this meeting to discuss not only Peters Canyon Trail, but possible bikeways throughout north-central Orange County, including connections to the Santa Ana River Trail, Aliso Creek, and other useful commuter routes.
Orange County Bicycle Coalition Board Members, concerned citizens, and bicycles advocates have spent hundreds of hours now traipsing and riding the dusty trails of Peters Canyon. And we’ve come to one conclusion:
As flimsy and self-serving as most of the Anti arguments are, there is real value in the rural experience Peters Canyon provides to, an albeit limited number of, Orange County citizens.
For this reason it is abundantly clear that paving over the Main trail, as OCTA and OC Parks originally suggested, is insensitive and untenable. The historic and physical context of Peters Canyon have to be considered.
OCBC’s Board is developing recommendations toward a Win-Win solution which we’ll post here soon. But for the record, “win-win” has nothing to do with routing outside the Park, along Jamboree or otherwise.
While we hear a lot of fervent language about marauding mountain bikers– a subset of the larger mountain biking community– what’s lost on the Anti Crowd is the fact that the vast majority of bicyclists are neither marauders nor mountain bikers. They are average OC citizens who use bicycles of all types for affordable recreation, health, and transportation.
The long awaited Class 1 trail through the Canyon is intended to link the Park with other communities, other parks, and other useful destinations. It will connect Santiago Canyon College with UCI for instance, Santiago Canyon Rd. to the Tustin Metrolink, Anaheim Hills to Newport’s Back Bay. Kids, couples, retirees, friends out for a day’s adventure, all are attracted to a safe, engineered, well paved path away from car traffic and noise.
Until the 1980s what bicyclists sought was a predictable solid surface to ride on. Then came mountain bikes, and guess what? They like to ride in the dirt. And we hear from mountain bikers in the Anti crowd who prefer to share Peters’ well worn trails with walkers, runners, and horseback riders.
But how do the majority of Antis feel about that? Apparently not too good. The comments we read talk about an overcrowded park and the “danger” of “high speed” bicyclists– by which they mean mountain bikers– whizzing by on Peters’ busy trails.
Why then, we wonder, would the Anti’s oppose a paved trail which would attract many, if not most of those very same mountain bikers? Because here’s something we’re convinced of: the majority of mountain bikers on the main trail today are just passin’ through. And if it means getting to the real trails, the single track, the hidden “toys,” the gnarly downhills some place else (say, Santiago Oaks) faster, a lot of them will hop on the pavement.